Knowledge Pack Files
Performance Marketing Knowledge Pack Files
Browse the source files that power the Performance Marketing MCP server knowledge pack.
sidebutton install marketing Placement Quality — MFA Detection, Scoring & Supply Chain Validation
MFA Detection Checklist
Score each placement against these signals. Any 3+ flags = high MFA risk, recommend exclusion.
Signal 1: Ad Density
| Threshold | Risk | Action |
|---|---|---|
| Peak ad density >50% of screen | High — auto-reject | Exclude immediately |
| Average ad density >35% of screen | High | Flag for review |
| Mobile ad density >30% | Violation of Coalition for Better Ads | Exclude |
| Ad density 20-30% | Moderate | Monitor performance |
| Ad density <20% | Normal | No action |
Calculation: Sum heights of all ads within main content portion / total height of main content. Exclude headers, footers, navigation.
Signal 2: Ad Refresh Behavior
| Indicator | Risk |
|---|---|
| Ads auto-refresh while page is in background tab | High |
| Ad refresh interval <30 seconds | High |
| Multiple ad auctions per slot per page view | High |
| 1,000+ impressions served to single user in one session | Critical (Adalytics threshold) |
| Standard refresh (60+ seconds, user-initiated) | Normal |
Signal 3: Traffic Source Composition
| Traffic Mix | Risk |
|---|---|
| >70% paid/arbitrage traffic | High MFA signal |
| >50% paid traffic with low direct/organic | Moderate-High |
| Balanced mix (organic, direct, search, social, paid) | Normal |
| Majority organic/direct traffic | Low risk |
Check via DSP reporting (some DSPs surface traffic source signals) or third-party tools.
Signal 4: Content Quality
| Indicator | Risk |
|---|---|
| AI-generated or syndicated content with no original reporting | High |
| No author attribution, no editorial voice | High |
| Content optimized purely for ad arbitrage (clickbait headlines, slideshow pagination) | High |
| Thin content surrounding excessive ad placements | High |
| Original content with bylines, sources, editorial standards | Normal |
Signal 5: Site Design & UX
| Indicator | Risk |
|---|---|
| Templated/cookie-cutter layout (identical to other MFA sites) | High |
| Aggressive pop-ups, auto-play video with sound, full-screen overlays | High |
| No clear navigation, confusing UX designed to generate accidental clicks | High |
| Professional design with clear content hierarchy | Normal |
ACT Classification Quick Reference
| Category | Primary Signal | Secondary Signals |
|---|---|---|
| Arbitrage | >50% paid traffic sourcing | Usually accompanied by high ad density |
| Clutter | Ad-to-content ratio >35% average | Rapidly refreshing placements, MFA layout |
| Template | Generic/AI content + cookie-cutter design | Fastest-growing category; harder to detect |
Source: DeepSee.io ACT Framework
Placement Quality Scorecard
Rate each placement on a 0-100 scale across four dimensions:
| Dimension | Weight | Score Criteria |
|---|---|---|
| Viewability | 30% | >70% = 100, 50-70% = 70, 30-50% = 40, <30% = 0 |
| MFA risk | 25% | 0 MFA signals = 100, 1-2 signals = 50, 3+ signals = 0 |
| IVT rate | 25% | <2% = 100, 2-5% = 70, 5-10% = 30, >10% = 0 |
| Performance | 20% | Above avg CPA/CTR = 100, avg = 70, below avg = 30, no conversions = 0 |
Quality Score = weighted average. Action thresholds:
- 80-100: Allowlist candidate
- 60-79: Monitor monthly
- 40-59: Flag for review, consider exclusion
- <40: Exclude immediately
Supply Chain Validation
Three-layer transparency check (IAB Tech Lab):
| Layer | What | Check |
|---|---|---|
| ads.txt / app-ads.txt | Publisher declares authorized sellers | Verify seller IDs match what you see in bid stream |
| sellers.json | SSP declares identity of all sellers | Cross-reference with ads.txt entries |
| SupplyChain Object | Full path from publisher to buyer | Verify each hop is authorized; fewer hops = lower fraud risk |
Run automated validation weekly. IAB Tech Lab provides validation service. Flag any broken chains or unauthorized resellers.
IVT Classification (MRC Standard)
| Tier | Type | Detection | Examples |
|---|---|---|---|
| GIVT (General) | Routine filtration | Lists, parameter checks | Bots, spiders, crawlers, non-browser user agents, pre-fetch |
| SIVT (Sophisticated) | Advanced analytics | Multipoint corroboration | Hijacked devices, adware, malware, misappropriated content |
All MRC-accredited vendors must apply GIVT detection. SIVT detection strongly encouraged.
Benchmark: TAG-certified channels achieve 1.41% IVT rate (88% reduction vs industry average).
Verification Vendor Selection Guide
| Use Case | Recommended |
|---|---|
| Full-stack brand safety + MFA + IVT | IAS or DoubleVerify (both GARM-aligned, MRC-accredited) |
| MFA-specific detection (web + CTV + mobile) | Pixalate (cross-platform MFA risk scoring) |
| Supply chain validation | IAB Tech Lab automated service |
| IVT-focused detection | HUMAN Security (2,500+ signals per impression, sub-12ms) |
| Attention measurement | IAS (attention metrics) or Adelaide (attention-based media quality) |
Pre-bid vs post-bid: Use both layers. Pre-bid blocks known risks before spending. Post-bid discovers new patterns and measures actual placement quality. Pre-bid alone misses novel MFA sites. Post-bid alone wastes spend on known risks.